Bush Bashing Corporation
The capture of Saddam has to be one of those bits of news that's wholly good.
But the BBC managed in its coverage, and with its selection of impartial commentators, to find more downsides than I would have believed.
The video of the medical was 'humiliating' and would enrage macho Arab males.
WE made Saddam (obviously I don't mean good liberals like us, I mean those evil white, Christian men like Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice).
"The US will be worried about an open trial and what Saddam will say about the days when he was supported by the West" (John Simpson on R5)
"Don't forget the US supported Saddam for 25 years. Some of his associates are neing held in conditions that are too lenient - or inhumane" (Anas Al-Tikriti of the Muslim Association of Britain, unable to make his mind up on R5.)
If he's handed over to the Iraqis he'll be executed - so he should face an international court with Human Rights standards (which will mean he can't be executed).
If he's handed over to an international court it'll show that the US don't want Iraqis running their own affairs.
Are the US in breach of the Geneva conventions ?
The only item missing was on how the expense of keeping him might damage 'the already fragile US economy'. Maybe today.
Trimmed
12 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment