tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post6106867499303341726..comments2024-03-29T09:13:55.008+00:00Comments on UK Commentators: A Few Chunks Of Rock Salt In The Curate's LaneLabanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12031578024191117985noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-52046248030434345442009-02-07T10:51:00.000+00:002009-02-07T10:51:00.000+00:00At least in the blogsphere the real issues are bei...At least in the blogsphere the real issues are being talked about. No politician has the guts to make this case. Human Rights, Equality, Race and Religious laws all compound any possibility of an open debate.<BR/><BR/>Our country IS being undermined. Our culture has been battered by all manner of political correctness. Our society is breaking down so that even our highest religious celebrities (I'm a non-believer) can submit to the possibility of Sharia law.<BR/><BR/>The numbers matters because they show the trend. Our old 2.2 children family is being fast overtaken by the breeding of our islamic cousins!<BR/><BR/>THUD has the right idea, though we need more of his activity to have any chance. It isn't the answer of course because our country should already have the "No Vacancies" sign over its its gates. Instead the NuLab government has accelerated the ignorance of previous governments towards immigration and simply let more in.<BR/><BR/>The cultural war has begun, the war on our society is underway. In a century or so, this decade will be called "the greatest decade in Britistan's history". It will be the decade that the future islamic government of what was once the UK recognises as the starting point of the end of British society and the beginning of the takeover by Islam. Happy times.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02430615784443429947noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-19272965166329553652009-02-05T18:29:00.000+00:002009-02-05T18:29:00.000+00:00Anonymous, glad to be in agreement with you now! I...Anonymous, glad to be in agreement with you now! <BR/>I certainly don't relish the idea of starting off the New Britain by spending time on a huge burial/disinfection/house clearance schedule!<BR/> Most of us don't want to take part in violent action: and the immigrants would have doughty defenders in the folks like the black-clad thugs Communuty Service Trust (or whatever that sinister body is called)who sometimes tirn up to crack a few skulls when rightists meet here.<BR/>Also, it'd have to be a Europe-wide concerted effort ...morality apart, it's a non-starter.<BR/>We must either make return home ATTRACTIVE to the others - and there do appeaer to be a few little-publicised programmes for this - or just pray for a John Wyndham type of catastrophe that would take a lot of the responsibility out of our hands.<BR/>(Incidentally, our literature has been hugely rich in future-disaster-leading to lo-tech, lo-population reconstruction scenarios since before HG Wells: this may indicate that the malaise about the way life's led here goes back a long way)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-25797904161592380152009-02-05T12:24:00.000+00:002009-02-05T12:24:00.000+00:00"But you can only arrive at that by a merciless pr..."But you can only arrive at that by a merciless programme of state intervention - giving Porritt free reign, putting noxious chemicals in the drinking water (antidote only available to SELECTED parents), even death squads. <BR/><BR/>Non-Christian Rightists in the UK seem not always to fight off a Madole-like inclination to wish to imitate Pol Pol or Mao."<BR/><BR/>Despite earlier disagreements with you, Shillingajar, I do agree with you on this.<BR/><BR/>Yes, it would be nice to have a UK population of around 40 million, but no, it should not be sought after by State violence. My hope is for a gentle and gradual decline and later stabilisation as the outcome of many individual choices.<BR/><BR/>Same goes for talk of repatriating entire ethnic groups - as if the forcible removal of millions could be achieved without immense bloodshed and depravity. But no doubt some like to fantasise about such things.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-35808446289987305282009-02-05T10:29:00.000+00:002009-02-05T10:29:00.000+00:00Yes, a 40 million population wd. be fine.But you c...Yes, a 40 million population wd. be fine.<BR/><BR/>But you can only arrive at that by a merciless programme of state intervention - giving Porritt free reign, putting noxious chemicals in the drinking water (antidote only available to SELECTED parents), even death squads. <BR/><BR/>Non-Christian Rightists in the UK seem not always to fight off a Madole-like inclination to wish to imitate Pol Pol or Mao.<BR/> <BR/>I seem to remember Mrs Gandhi underwriting a programme of forcible male sterilisation in India...and there's always the notorious Morgenthau Plan, and the sinister methods outlined in Kaufmann's "Germany must perish" <BR/><BR/>- Look, mate, you CAN'T use the enemies weapons in this way! Turn his sword and guns back against himself, yes, of course. But you can't use them in your territories against your people. <BR/><BR/>Yes, Frodo was tempted to use the Ring - ostensibly to do good: but by using it he would have BECOME the enemy.<BR/><BR/>And of course fertility is a natural good. Use it responsibly and respectfully. Don't interfere with it chemically, or mechanically, or by means of politics.<BR/><BR/>And I agree: we are going to have to bid farwell to our immigrant population/colonisers.<BR/>I was a bit iffy on the methods earlier - and I still am, because, as a well-known American rightist remarked, he's had all sorts of messages of support from folks willing to die for the new Utopia, but few from those who were willing to help him build it!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-88855541200262698502009-02-05T09:56:00.000+00:002009-02-05T09:56:00.000+00:00"There were only @ 40 million Brits in WW2. Would ..."There were only @ 40 million Brits in WW2. Would it be so bad to go back to that population density?"<BR/><BR/>Of course not. If anything, more space, less pressure on public services and cheaper housing would likely push fertility rates back to replacement levels.<BR/><BR/>Stabilising our population at around something like the figure you've stated seems very sensible.<BR/><BR/>As regards Shillingajar's effervescent comments - no fertility is not a pathological condition, but you can have too much of a good thing.<BR/><BR/>As countries like Bangladesh and Nigeria are discovering.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-63184225353819160252009-02-05T01:24:00.000+00:002009-02-05T01:24:00.000+00:00shillingajar, demographic decline is relative.Ther...shillingajar, demographic decline is relative.<BR/><BR/>There were only @ 40 million Brits in WW2. Would it be so bad to go back to that population density?<BR/><BR/>Less pressure on housing, roads, green space, less dependency on imported food.<BR/><BR/>Doesnt so bad like that. Of course <I>our</I> numbers are falling and being replaced by the invader. Thats the disaster.<BR/><BR/>I was trying to add a bit of perspective. I'm on your side mate!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-17215880237327459772009-02-04T20:42:00.000+00:002009-02-04T20:42:00.000+00:00I am doing my bit to breed my way out of this demo...I am doing my bit to breed my way out of this demographic disaster!Thudhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18320037763190473684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-7942169097264583962009-02-04T20:19:00.000+00:002009-02-04T20:19:00.000+00:00"British demographic decline would not be an issue..."British demographic decline would not be an issue without the invasion."<BR/>More from Anonymous. Why do you say this?<BR/>So national suicide is fine as long as no-one else comes to live in our island?<BR/>"Write me as one who HATES his fellow-men!" must be YOUR motto!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-6178142148993482412009-02-04T19:28:00.000+00:002009-02-04T19:28:00.000+00:00"Reliable contraception and women's ability to hav..."Reliable contraception and women's ability to have control over their fertility should be seen as praiseworthy achievements of Western societies" <BR/>Er, WHY, Anonymous?<BR/>Fertility is a blessing like a good digestion, or a keen mind. To treat it as though it were a pathological condition of sickness needing a remedy is wrong.<BR/>Granted, we now know that the ancient Roman Vomitorium was just an exit from a theatre and not the place to go to throw up after a too-heavy meal and to make room for more: but the principle of senseless indulgence followed by a violent "remedy" is the same one.<BR/>"Society" doesn't control fertility, anyway; it's a clique of doctors,drug manufacturers, scientists, politicians and publicists that does that for you. you being merely their raw material. YOU can no more "control your fertility" without the help of those folks than you can grow a foot taller merely by willing it.<BR/>I hope you don't make the hslfwit mistake of confounding abortion with contraception: it doesn't prevent conception but uses hideous violence to destroy the results.<BR/>A nation that thinks like you doesn't DESERVE to survive. A reason cited by some historians for the destruction of Carthage by Rome was that the Romans hated the Carthaginian cult of child-sacrifice. Even the cruel Milton was shocked by this, and lamented the fate of the children "who passed by fire to his grim idol", the 'him' here being Moloch. <BR/>Seems like someone is controlling your intelligence as well as your fertility. <BR/>Wake up, and don't parrot liberal cliches.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-52466601505829288652009-02-04T18:01:00.000+00:002009-02-04T18:01:00.000+00:00British demographic decline would not be an issue ...British demographic decline would not be an issue without the invasion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-37715332758360275202009-02-04T15:56:00.000+00:002009-02-04T15:56:00.000+00:00By which I mean it has no objective factual existe...By which I mean it has <I>no objective factual existence.</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-58169681331235350832009-02-04T15:55:00.000+00:002009-02-04T15:55:00.000+00:00"'Professor Peach said that the high numb..."'Professor Peach said that the high number of Muslims under the age of 4 — 301,000 as of September last year — would benefit Britain's future labour market through taxes that would subsequently contribute to sustaining the country's ageing population'.<BR/>Er... no, Prof Peach, not if the soicioeconomic indices of many of our 'muslim communities' (as enumerated in last years NAO report) persist.Instead of contributing to the country, 3 of our largest 'muslim communities' (in descending size order the Pakistani, the Bangladeshi & the Somali)are a fiscal drag on the wider economy because their rates of 'economic activity' are much lower than those of the general population."<BR/><BR/>This is <I>racist</I>, and therefore has objective, factual existence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-4268078074627362222009-02-04T15:09:00.000+00:002009-02-04T15:09:00.000+00:00Our liberal elite deals with demographic matters o...Our liberal elite deals with demographic matters only through a prism comprised in equal parts of euphemism and wishful thinking.<BR/>The euphemism in this post is provided by Anne Owers, (someone who apparently sees her job as bringing the rationales of penal institutions and 3* hotels into closer alignment).<BR/>She says- 'too many of the most volatile prisons, including top security jails holding an increasingly challenging mix of very serious offenders and those establishments holding young men, had not been judged safe in inspections'. Isn't the word 'challenging' a godsend to guardianistas like this NuLab Dame ?<BR/>The wishful thinking comes from Ceri Peach (BTW it looks as if he has enjoyed a few too many fairtrade coffees in the SCR at Manchester Uni with your old friend 'Ludi' Simpson.They both seem capable of extruding pc bilge at an alarming rate.)According to the Times article-'Professor Peach said that the high number of Muslims under the age of 4 — 301,000 as of September last year — would benefit Britain's future labour market through taxes that would subsequently contribute to sustaining the country's ageing population'.<BR/>Er... no, Prof Peach, not if the soicioeconomic indices of many of our 'muslim communities' (as enumerated in last years NAO report) persist.Instead of contributing to the country, 3 of our largest 'muslim communities' (in descending size order the Pakistani, the Bangladeshi & the Somali)are a fiscal drag on the wider economy because their rates of 'economic activity' are much lower than those of the general population.The female element in this demographic is overwhelmingly comprised of full time mothers ( and often mothers of very large familes as well).Meanwhile the males in these communities subsist very disproportionately on JSA and, increasingly, disability benefits, and pay no direct taxes.<BR/>Prof Peach may promise the rest of us a dividend in the near future;however the facts at present indicate that a surcharge on the rest of us is a far more likely scenario.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-19011329378039753742009-02-04T11:17:00.000+00:002009-02-04T11:17:00.000+00:00I disagree with the comments about a demographic '...I disagree with the comments about a demographic 'vacuum' being created by the Pill and feminism.<BR/><BR/>It is not low birthrates which pull in people from other countries. Rather, it is a failure to establish and enforce a coherent immigration strategy which is to blame.<BR/><BR/>Reliable contraception and women's ability to have control over their fertility should be seen as praiseworthy achievements of Western societies.<BR/><BR/>Achievements which many other countries in the world would do well to learn from, if they wish to avoid the mass starvation and civil strife which will follow from allowing birthrates to outstrip resources.<BR/><BR/>It should also be made clear to them that we will no longer allow our country to be used as an expansion area for their burgeoning populations.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-31857276311799542202009-02-04T09:40:00.000+00:002009-02-04T09:40:00.000+00:00Hold on there! The number of Muslims in British ja...Hold on there! The number of Muslims in British jails MUST have been inflated by a factor of about 3000%!<BR/><BR/>We all KNOW - for we have often been told so - that Islam is the religion of peace! As one remarked recently to me, "When we are in control, there WILL be peace: we won't permit Christian preaching as it might disturb the majority." <BR/><BR/>The high proportion of Muslims in our jails MUST mean that they have all been framed by our institutionally racist guardians!<BR/><BR/>In the very, very, few instances where a genuine offence MIGHT have been committed by a Muslim, might one suggest that his/her action was a totally justified response to a perceived threat - like seeing someone bring their dog onto the bus?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com