tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post5491770662896171474..comments2024-03-29T09:13:55.008+00:00Comments on UK Commentators: "In the Beginning ... back in 1955 ..."Labanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12031578024191117985noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-45157834773612441962020-08-26T07:02:22.800+00:002020-08-26T07:02:22.800+00:00Great Work
promotional work birminghamGreat Work <br /><a href="https://www.varii-promotions.co.uk/birmingham-promo-staff/" rel="nofollow">promotional work birmingham</a>alberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07326063759904039831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-73805436928917828392008-03-10T09:49:00.000+00:002008-03-10T09:49:00.000+00:00No magazine called 'Housekeeping Monthly' has ever...No magazine called 'Housekeeping Monthly' has ever been published in Britain. But the title is sufficiently close to the real magazine 'Good Housekeeping' to induce a "I'm sure I've heard of it somewhere" type reaction.<BR/><BR/>The tone of the spoof piece would be unrealistic for the 1930s, never mind the 1950s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-59483227519042291692008-03-07T14:13:00.000+00:002008-03-07T14:13:00.000+00:00Very much like the 'rule of thumb' urban myth - re...Very much like the 'rule of thumb' urban myth - remember?<BR/><BR/>http://christianaidwatch.blogspot.com/2008/03/black-propaganda-in-war-on-past.htmlMr Grumpyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05317128956060393033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-76755484146514031722008-03-06T19:14:00.000+00:002008-03-06T19:14:00.000+00:00If you follow the link you'll see that it apparent...If you follow the link you'll see that it apparently emerged as a fax or photocopied article in the late 80s. The current version (see Wikipedia) features a 1957 magazine cover, clipped from a website set up in 1990.Labanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12031578024191117985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-41225540906853315692008-03-06T17:40:00.000+00:002008-03-06T17:40:00.000+00:00Surely this is an urban myth.Has anyone actually s...Surely this is an urban myth.<BR/><BR/>Has anyone actually seen this book?<BR/><BR/>If so, did they check the fonts? I bet it was produced using Microsoft Word.<BR/><BR/>It's simply no believable that anyone, even in 1955, could write stuff like that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-26778285355883491572008-03-06T13:40:00.000+00:002008-03-06T13:40:00.000+00:00Wildgoose, never mind 1967, my girlfriend of 10 ye...Wildgoose, never mind 1967, my girlfriend of 10 years phones me to tell me that my wages have been deposited, and then tells me how much I am allowed to take out.danhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15142553268189916944noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-61821816157467933732008-03-06T12:16:00.000+00:002008-03-06T12:16:00.000+00:00Chief Seattle would approve.Chief Seattle would approve.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-10713415304620162302008-03-06T10:13:00.000+00:002008-03-06T10:13:00.000+00:00Ah, but it is fake but true, which justifies anyth...Ah, but it is <I>fake but true</I>, which justifies anything on the Left.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-74607472271805687062008-03-06T07:54:00.000+00:002008-03-06T07:54:00.000+00:00Never mind 1955, my parents were married in 1963 a...Never mind 1955, my parents were married in 1963 and my father just handed over his wage packet all his working life.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02948105455433369982noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5187043.post-66954966472024350682008-03-06T00:05:00.000+00:002008-03-06T00:05:00.000+00:00Of course if you ask anyone was there in 1955 thin...Of course if you ask anyone was there in 1955 things were not very like that.<BR/>The bloke handed over his pay packet - often unopened. The wife decided near everything.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com